![]() ![]() Cameras tend to be less conspicuous, and unlike traditional film, the camera doesn’t need to be aimed directly at a subject to have them framed in the shot. While many of the tenets of the SPJ Code of Ethics freely translate to spherical video, the fact of the matter is that today, many subjects in a 360° video will not realize that they are being filmed. ![]() While viewers could go to Cairo, IL, the place viewers inside inside a crowded, unfiltered living room and a chaotic classroom, and to hear the voiceover narration of the residents themselves, cultivates a sense of empathy that would be hard to capture otherwise. The New York Times A Fading City Loses an Unlikely Lifeline However, if you are unable to mark up more than one “yes” for the above questions, you may want to reconsider the decision to shoot in spherical video and stick to traditional film techniques. In an ideal world, the answer to all five questions will be an emphatic “ yes.” That said, not every video needs to be ideal. Will we be able to generate greater empathy with a 360° video?Īre you comfortable ceding control of the experience to the viewer? ![]() Is the story enhanced by a better understanding of a space?ĭoes the 360° video support the narrative rather than complicating it? We encourage content creators to ask themselves the following questions before deciding to shoot in 360:Īre we transporting the viewer to a place they cannot otherwise be? It is true that a spherical video can transport and immerse viewers in a way that is hard to replicate with traditional film, but which shouldn’t be used for the sake of creating 360° video. Before embarking on any 360° video project, we strongly encourage you to ask why. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |